Dear Sui Community, First of all, thank you for showing so much interest in my @SuiNetwork Report. I’ve published many Sui reports before, but it’s rare to see such passionate reactions — both positive and critical. In a way, this enthusiasm itself is a clear counterexample to the idea that “Sui has no community.” When I released the very first version of the Sui Report back in 2024, there was barely any response at all. Seeing how much the Sui community has grown over the past one or two years, and how many diverse voices and opinions it now includes, truly makes me happy. I also appreciate not only the praise but the criticism. To be honest, I worked alone on nearly 90 pages of research in both Korean and English, so I simply couldn’t give full attention to every detail. But based on the feedback I’ve received this time, my goal is to produce a much higher-quality report next time. The same goes for how I mention projects. Going forward, when I prepare the next report, I’ll make sure to ask the Sui community for input — which projects deserve more attention, which builders should be highlighted(no need to pay..lol. just send me DM or replies are fine) One clear shortcoming of this report was that I wrote it too independently, without community feedback. I also admit there was a bit of arrogance in thinking I already knew everything about the ecosystem, and maybe I spent less time reviewing some teams I personally wasn’t fond of. I’m human too, and I think that affected it. For the next Sui Report, I’ll revise it extensively while actively listening to feedback from the community and the ecosystem. As for the validator topic — @FPvalidated operates validators on both @WalrusProtocol and @SuiNetwork, but we have never sold a single token from our validator rewards. Walrus is approaching its first anniversary, and although we’ve claimed rewards, we’ve never sold them on the market. The same applies to Sui, and all of this is visible on-chain if you’d like to verify. Running validators and creating content in return for rewards is not something I see as “wrong.” Other validators contribute through infrastructure and tooling; we contribute through content and research — that’s our form of value. And unlike the so-called “grifters,” we don’t dump validator rewards onto the market. Of course, at some point we may need to sell — we also have node operation costs and server expenses. But we have strong conviction in $WAL and $SUI, which is why we continue to stake rather than sell, even at our own expense. That’s what we believe in, and that won’t change. Neither I nor @FourPillarsFP are perfect. That’s why constant feedback is necessary. If there’s something we need to change, we’ll change it; if there’s something we can improve, we’ll improve it — to create better reports and content that satisfy more people. Thank you for your attention and continued support.